Negligent Security

Negligent Security Lawyer in Temecula

Direct Representation for Injuries Caused by Inadequate Security

I represent people injured in assaults, robberies, and other foreseeable criminal incidents when inadequate property security may have contributed to their harm. At Law Office of Rob Schelling, A Professional Corporation, I personally handle every case I accept, giving clients direct access to an attorney with 36 years of legal experience.

Negligent security is a type of premises liability claim involving a failure to provide reasonable protection against foreseeable criminal conduct. My personal injury practice includes these claims, and I provide legal guidance to residents of Temecula and surrounding areas in California.

To discuss an injury involving inadequate security, call (951) 355-2965 and schedule a consultation with me.

Where Negligent Security Claims Can Arise

A negligent security claim focuses on whether those controlling a property took reasonable precautions in light of known or foreseeable risks. These incidents can occur at apartment communities, hotels, parking lots, bars, retail locations, and other businesses where tenants, customers, guests, or visitors are assaulted or robbed.

Responsibility depends partly on who controlled the property and who had security duties. Depending on the circumstances, potentially responsible parties may include property owners, managers, lessees, security contractors, and others who work on or possess the premises.

Security conditions that may require investigation include:

Broken or inadequate lighting in entrances, walkways, stairwells, and parking areas
Defective locks, gates, or access controls
Missing, disabled, or poorly maintained surveillance systems
Insufficient staffing or security personnel
Inadequate responses to known threats or recurring safety problems

A security problem doesn’t automatically establish liability. The inquiry considers control over the premises, notice of the danger, the precautions that were reasonable under the circumstances, and whether the security failure contributed to the injury.

Proving a California Negligent Security Claim

California Civil Code section 1714(a) establishes a general duty to use ordinary care in managing property. A court may evaluate that duty under the factors identified in Rowland v. Christian, including the foreseeability of harm and the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury.

The required showing of foreseeability can depend on the protective measure at issue. In Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center, the California Supreme Court explained that a more burdensome measure, such as hiring security guards, requires a stronger foreseeability showing. Prior similar incidents on the property are often central to that analysis.

Specific Threats & Reasonable Protective Measures

A history of similar incidents isn’t the only basis for a duty. Delgado v. Trax Bar & Grill recognizes that a business with notice of a specific, impending threat may have a duty to take reasonable protective measures, even without earlier similar incidents. The nature of the warning and the actions reasonably available at the time both matter.

Evidence of Foreseeability & Notice

Evidence can show whether a property owner, manager, tenant, or security provider knew about a threat or recurring criminal activity. It can also document the condition of security features and how personnel responded before and during the incident.

Relevant records may include:

Security logs and prior incident reports
Camera footage from the property or nearby areas
Maintenance records for locks, gates, lights, and surveillance equipment
Witness testimony about threats, prior incidents, or property conditions
Communications showing notice of a specific danger or repeated criminal activity

Preserving this material early can be critical because video may be overwritten and records may become harder to locate. I examine the available evidence in relation to the claimed duty, the security measure at issue, and the conduct of each potentially responsible party.

Continue Reading Read Less

Personal Attention for Negligent Security Cases in Temecula

I handle each case directly rather than transferring it to another attorney. Clients can discuss the evidence, legal options, and developments with the lawyer responsible for their representation.

Negligent security cases often require close examination of property control, foreseeability, prior incidents, and time-sensitive records. I provide guidance based on the specific facts rather than assuming every assault or robbery creates a valid premises liability claim.

Discuss the Incident & Your Legal Options

A consultation provides an opportunity to discuss what happened, where the incident occurred, and which security conditions may have contributed to your injuries. I can assess the available information and explain the legal issues that may affect a claim.

The contact form offers another way to reach me. An early discussion can identify evidence that may require prompt attention.

Call (951) 355-2965 to schedule a consultation about a negligent security injury.

Compensation in a Negligent Security Injury Claim

Recoverable losses depend on the injuries, supporting evidence, circumstances of the incident, and parties found legally responsible. Economic damages address documented financial losses, while non-economic damages address physical and emotional consequences.

A claim may seek compensation for:

Medical expenses related to the injuries
Lost or missed wages
Reduced earning capacity
Physical or emotional pain and suffering
Loss of quality of life or consortium
Property damage caused during the incident

California Filing Deadlines & Comparative Negligence

California’s filing deadline for a personal injury lawsuit is generally two years from the injury date under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. A property damage claim generally has a three-year deadline under Code of Civil Procedure section 338. Other rules may change when a particular deadline begins or expires.

If a government entity owns or operates the property, Government Code section 911.2 generally requires an administrative claim within six months of the injury before a lawsuit can proceed. Missing an applicable deadline can affect the right to pursue compensation, so the property’s ownership and operation should be identified promptly.

California uses pure comparative negligence. If an injured person is assigned part of the fault, recoverable damages are reduced by that percentage rather than automatically barred. The allocation of fault depends on the conduct of everyone involved and the evidence supporting each position.

Steps to Take After an Assault or Robbery

Obtain medical attention and report the incident to the property owner or manager. Ask for an incident report, and collect the names and contact information of witnesses and relevant property personnel.

Preserve photographs, communications, receipts, and other materials documenting the location, conditions, injuries, and people involved. Camera footage, security logs, and access records can be lost or overwritten, so prompt preservation is important.

Contact me before giving a statement to the property owner’s insurer. I can discuss the request, available documentation, and legal issues to consider before you describe the incident to an insurance representative.

Continue Reading Read Less

Contact Rob Schelling Today!

First Name
Please enter your first name.
Last Name
Please enter your last name.
Phone
Please enter your phone number.

This isn't a valid phone number.
Email
Please enter your email address.

This isn't a valid email address.
Are you a new client?
Please make a selection.
How can we help you?
Please enter a message.
By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from Law Office of Rob Schelling, A Professional Corporation at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy